Ok, I care passionately about this topic, so please forgive my strong post :-)
I got an interesting comment on one of my blog posts Father's day Frolic 1/2
I got an interesting comment on one of my blog posts Father's day Frolic 1/2
The reader's comment was as follows
I respect the lifestyle that you have with your Master but sometimes it feels as if your views are kind of patriarchal. You always keep citing Indian culture where there is a deep rooted history of the abuse and contempt for women. You have chosen this lifestyle but Indian culture forces all women into it. And it also encourages practices like sati. I hope taking part in this lifestyle does not make you feel worthless and that you consider yourself equal to men and do not believe that men should rule all women and become their bosses like in the ancient societies.
Oh dear God!! Here we go again!
I explained to the reader that far from feeling "worthless", I am extremely happy and feel fulfilled with my "slave" life. I also admitted that I believed in traditional roles for both women and men and completely rejected the assertion that men and women were "equal". This assertion makes absolutely no sense to me personally, since the facts on the ground don't support it even though radical feminism has trumpeted it for several decades. Women and men are different and unequal in so many ways, it is laughable that somebody can even make this claim credibly. God and Evolution have made us different and we have complimentary skills and strengths.
Men have generally been breadwinners, protectors and providers for the family. This has generally made them physically stronger, more dominant and naturally polygamous. Feminists hate hearing this, but it is what it is.
Women on the other hand evolved to nurture and take care of the family. They thus need protection and are naturally hypergamous. These traits were essential for the survival of their children and themselves. This means that women will rarely respect or seek out "meek men" This is why even today, women tend to get attracted towards "dangerous or bad-ass men". God built this into our DNA. A hypergamous woman will usually tire of and/or abandon a man who is not an "alpha" even if he bends over backwards to pacify her. This is built into her DNA, no matter what cultural brainwashing she is subjected to!
The best men, like Swami, have a healthy mix of Alpha and "nice" traits in them and know when to let their women experience them. Swami's alpha traits, excite me sexually and I feel irresistibly drawn to him, but when he needs to, he lets his "nice" side shine and this just makes me completely adore him. It makes me want to be his fuck slut, have his babies, serve him, worship him, do everything I can to make him happy!!! And BTW, all this happened even before we embraced a "Master Slave lifestyle". Three months into our marriage, I knew I was hopelessly hooked. I didn't know why, I didn't even know anything about "BDSM" or "Consensual Slavery" or "D/S",. Swami was never abusive, hardly ever got angry or yelled at me or tyrannize me; just the way he spoke, behaved, carried himself, the skill with which he subtly exerted his domination over me, made my pussy wet for him and my mind fall completely in love with him. And I believe that a lot of the women are like that and have always been like that.
Feminists (they are not really feminists, they are men haters) know all this is true deep down and that is the reason they get mad at submissive women, because these women are defying and exposing the misandry that is deeply entrenched in today's western culture. To divert attention away, these so called feminists characterize the submissive as suffering from some "deep psychological problems". The thought that some woman would embrace and celebrate "a man as the head of household" and submit to him drives them totally up the "proverbial feminist wall". Wasn't feminism supposed to be all about "choices for women?" Can I please please please kiss my husband's feet, kneel before him, cook for him, clean for him, and be his little fuck slut without you pitying and judging me? I don't begrudge you your "I am a single independent woman who doesn't need or want a man" or "I lord over a pussy whipped man" life do I?
The worst part is that now even some men have bought into this drivel. These men that advocate for the "men and women are equal" theory just fail to understand is that, there is something in us women that yearns to just "be taken and dominated" and if a man is unable and/or unwilling to do that, he will just be our "girl friend". This is not to say that all women like to be in a D/S or M/S relationship, but even in a vanilla relationship, if a man does not exhibit alpha traits, most women will not feel attracted to him.
With such different skills, strengths and needs, you cannot swap out one gender for another, or expect that one gender will perform well in another gender's roles. There are obviously exceptions to every rule but exceptions do not disprove the rule! I personally feel that when culture forces men and women to embrace roles that are completely antithetical to our genetic past, we are asking for trouble.
So yes, I strongly believe that Men should be heads of households, and that women should submit to men. I have seen too many cases where violating this precept has brought unhappiness and chaos to marriages and relationships without making either the men or women in such relationships feel fulfilled or satisfied.
Having said that, I also do not advocate that men and women who do not fit or like traditional roles should be ridiculed or frowned upon. So if there is a relationship where a dominant woman and a submissive man form a happy couple, more power to them. I don't believe that these are a majority of relationships but nonetheless, every successful relationship should be celebrated.
All this and more is explored in the following "call in talk show" from Tom Leykis.
Now even Swami rolled his eyes, at some of Tom's comments and language. Swami never addresses women as Bitches, or draws some blanket generalization about "American women" by saying that "he would never date an American woman", or call a woman a "whore" or "dumb broad" outside of sexual play.
As Swami said "The problem with Tom is that in his mind, all his generalizations prove the rule, while any observations on the other side are "exceptions to the rule. That is a pretty weak way to make your point".
But even with all that this program really does address this issue of "Traditional gender roles" in an interesting and entertaining way. Hope you enjoy listening to it.
I know Chutki and I giggled a lot and opened our mouths and our eyes wide in astonishment at some of the conversations :-)
I was even turned on sexually when Tom lit into some of the women in the program and beseeched Swami a few times to pull my hair and set me in my place. That was when Swami smacked me on my ass and left the room!!
I explained to the reader that far from feeling "worthless", I am extremely happy and feel fulfilled with my "slave" life. I also admitted that I believed in traditional roles for both women and men and completely rejected the assertion that men and women were "equal". This assertion makes absolutely no sense to me personally, since the facts on the ground don't support it even though radical feminism has trumpeted it for several decades. Women and men are different and unequal in so many ways, it is laughable that somebody can even make this claim credibly. God and Evolution have made us different and we have complimentary skills and strengths.
Men have generally been breadwinners, protectors and providers for the family. This has generally made them physically stronger, more dominant and naturally polygamous. Feminists hate hearing this, but it is what it is.
Women on the other hand evolved to nurture and take care of the family. They thus need protection and are naturally hypergamous. These traits were essential for the survival of their children and themselves. This means that women will rarely respect or seek out "meek men" This is why even today, women tend to get attracted towards "dangerous or bad-ass men". God built this into our DNA. A hypergamous woman will usually tire of and/or abandon a man who is not an "alpha" even if he bends over backwards to pacify her. This is built into her DNA, no matter what cultural brainwashing she is subjected to!
The best men, like Swami, have a healthy mix of Alpha and "nice" traits in them and know when to let their women experience them. Swami's alpha traits, excite me sexually and I feel irresistibly drawn to him, but when he needs to, he lets his "nice" side shine and this just makes me completely adore him. It makes me want to be his fuck slut, have his babies, serve him, worship him, do everything I can to make him happy!!! And BTW, all this happened even before we embraced a "Master Slave lifestyle". Three months into our marriage, I knew I was hopelessly hooked. I didn't know why, I didn't even know anything about "BDSM" or "Consensual Slavery" or "D/S",. Swami was never abusive, hardly ever got angry or yelled at me or tyrannize me; just the way he spoke, behaved, carried himself, the skill with which he subtly exerted his domination over me, made my pussy wet for him and my mind fall completely in love with him. And I believe that a lot of the women are like that and have always been like that.
Feminists (they are not really feminists, they are men haters) know all this is true deep down and that is the reason they get mad at submissive women, because these women are defying and exposing the misandry that is deeply entrenched in today's western culture. To divert attention away, these so called feminists characterize the submissive as suffering from some "deep psychological problems". The thought that some woman would embrace and celebrate "a man as the head of household" and submit to him drives them totally up the "proverbial feminist wall". Wasn't feminism supposed to be all about "choices for women?" Can I please please please kiss my husband's feet, kneel before him, cook for him, clean for him, and be his little fuck slut without you pitying and judging me? I don't begrudge you your "I am a single independent woman who doesn't need or want a man" or "I lord over a pussy whipped man" life do I?
The worst part is that now even some men have bought into this drivel. These men that advocate for the "men and women are equal" theory just fail to understand is that, there is something in us women that yearns to just "be taken and dominated" and if a man is unable and/or unwilling to do that, he will just be our "girl friend". This is not to say that all women like to be in a D/S or M/S relationship, but even in a vanilla relationship, if a man does not exhibit alpha traits, most women will not feel attracted to him.
With such different skills, strengths and needs, you cannot swap out one gender for another, or expect that one gender will perform well in another gender's roles. There are obviously exceptions to every rule but exceptions do not disprove the rule! I personally feel that when culture forces men and women to embrace roles that are completely antithetical to our genetic past, we are asking for trouble.
So yes, I strongly believe that Men should be heads of households, and that women should submit to men. I have seen too many cases where violating this precept has brought unhappiness and chaos to marriages and relationships without making either the men or women in such relationships feel fulfilled or satisfied.
Having said that, I also do not advocate that men and women who do not fit or like traditional roles should be ridiculed or frowned upon. So if there is a relationship where a dominant woman and a submissive man form a happy couple, more power to them. I don't believe that these are a majority of relationships but nonetheless, every successful relationship should be celebrated.
All this and more is explored in the following "call in talk show" from Tom Leykis.
Now even Swami rolled his eyes, at some of Tom's comments and language. Swami never addresses women as Bitches, or draws some blanket generalization about "American women" by saying that "he would never date an American woman", or call a woman a "whore" or "dumb broad" outside of sexual play.
As Swami said "The problem with Tom is that in his mind, all his generalizations prove the rule, while any observations on the other side are "exceptions to the rule. That is a pretty weak way to make your point".
But even with all that this program really does address this issue of "Traditional gender roles" in an interesting and entertaining way. Hope you enjoy listening to it.
I know Chutki and I giggled a lot and opened our mouths and our eyes wide in astonishment at some of the conversations :-)
I was even turned on sexually when Tom lit into some of the women in the program and beseeched Swami a few times to pull my hair and set me in my place. That was when Swami smacked me on my ass and left the room!!


